Hollywood News is your source for breaking news about Hollywood and entertainment, including movies, TV, reviews

Annette Bening Addresses Point Foundation Grads at Virtual Gala: "Speak Truth to Power"

Annette Bening Addresses Point Foundation Grads at Virtual Gala: Speak Truth to Power

Annette Bening has a message for the Point Foundation’s class of 2020: Keep changing, keep speaking up, and don’t forget to vote.

The veteran actress delivered a brief but impactful keynote commencement address presented online Tuesday as part of the Point Honors New York virtual gala. The event served to spotlight the graduating class of 2020 while raising money for the Point Foundation, the national LGBTQ scholarship fund billed as the largest provider of higher education scholarships for study in the U.S.

Bening said she was honored to have been asked by the foundation to "join the chorus of voices" offering congratulations to the grads. She has experience, too. Bening called herself a "proud graduate" of both Arizona’s Mesa Community College and San Francisco State University before launching into her advice and encouragement. She did so by quoting famed theoretical physicist and Nobel Prize winner Richard Feynman.

"In the words of Professor Richard Feynman, I’d say study what you love in the most original, irreverent and undisciplined way possible," said Bening. "And don’t forget, you’re under no obligation to remain the same person that you were a year ago, a month ago or even a day ago. You are here to create yourself, continuously."

She then acknowledged the current climate of political, racial and economic unrest as the United States faces a variety of pandemics due to racial injustice, COVID-19 and the worst recession since the Great Depression. "You’re coming of age during a time of foundational change, whether that applies to systemic racism or gender- and sexuality-based discrimination. I encourage you to speak truth to power in whatever way feels right to you," said Bening, mother to a transgender son. "Please keep your doors of perception open to the wonders of the world, and don’t forget to vote."

Bening’s comments were included in a sleek virtual production produced by LA-based JJLA that allowed guests to view at their leisure. Once clicking "enter," the production brought guests down a red carpet and inside the Point Honors Hall where a brief respite included a stop inside the Point Honors Lounge. There, actor, writer and comedian Michael Urie delivered welcome remarks, which were followed by the main attraction inside the Point Honors Atrium, set up as a typical gala affair with dinner tables and a stage.

Guests then got a chance to select from a variety of content from the program, including remarks from executive director and CEO Jorge Valencia, featured scholar Donna Scaffidi, a performance from Jagged Little Pill star Lauren Patten (who performed her favorite track from the show, "Hand in My Pocket"), remarks from Javier Muñoz, and thoughts from the graduating Point scholars.

Ahead of Bening’s remarks, an introduction featured Tamron Hall, Jason Collins, Steven Canals, Don Lemon, Judith Light and James Williams, the latter of whom is co-chair of the Point Foundation’s board of directors. Other supporters of the event included presenting sponsor Wells Fargo, principal sponsors Janssen Infectious Diseases and Lord Abbett.

For his part, Valencia also noted the atmosphere in the world at the moment, calling it "surreal" as well as challenging to deal with a pandemic, racial injustice and inequality all at once. "Unfortunately, none of these things have been handled with the kind of mature leadership that this situation requires," he said. "With all of this uncertainty swirling around us, there is one constant that has not changed and that is the steadfast belief that all of us at Point Foundation have in our scholars’ ability to make a difference."

Inspire Justice Activists on Juneteenth in Hollywood and Using the Day Off as a "Day On"

Inspire Justice Activists on Juneteenth in Hollywood and Using the Day Off as a Day On

The social impact fund's Brea Baker and Taylor K. Shaw, who educate and train stars, influencers and media companies to use their platforms for social good, explain how the entertainment industry can commit to diversity and racial justice in a "meaningful and not just momentary way."

Following recent weeks of racial justice protests and discussions, SAG-AFTRA, all of Hollywood's major agencies and several PR firms have announced Juneteenth will be a paid company holiday this year and going forward. Juneteenth marks the day, on June 19, 1865, when Union soldiers arrived in Texas to announce the Civil War had ended and all slaves were now free, thereby ending slavery in the U.S. — two and half years after Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation became official on January 1, 1863. 

Though celebrated in Black communities for generations, the day only recently has gained attention with white people and the call to recognize Juneteenth as a US federal holiday has gained steam. And though much of the entertainment industry will take Friday off, social impact fund Inspire Justice, which educates and trains stars, influencers and media companies to use their platforms for social good, has a different recommendation: "a day on."

Brea Baker, director of programming for Inspire Justice, and Taylor K. Shaw, social impact advisor for the organization as well as founder and CEO of production company Black Women Animate, talked to The Hollywood Reporter about how they recommend Hollywood spends Juneteenth, what they advise their celebrity clients to post and why the holiday's recognition is significant. 

There's been lots of discussion recently around Juneteenth as a paid holiday, but your group Inspire Justice says we should focus on a day on rather than a day off. Can you explain?

Brea Baker: The idea behind the day on is similar to MLK Day and the idea that allies specifically should not be using the day as just another paid holiday, but rather a day to be specifically intentional about racial justice and anti-Blackness in this country — specifically with the history of Juneteenth and its connection to the abolition of slavery, it should be day for self education on that legacy. The idea is that obviously Black folks should definitely take the day to rest and to celebrate and to enjoy, but for those who are not as closely tied to the specific history behind this holiday, they should take that time to learn about that history, to be in service to the Black community, etc.

What are some specific ways that entertainment companies should spend Juneteenth?

Baker: What we've been advocating to others is that they should be modeling for the rest of the industry and encouraging people, especially because this is so new and many teams have just made the decision to celebrate it as a day off this week, that in that time, they're able to model — whether that's through their social media platform or internal communication with their team — that they're letting folks know the intentionality behind what Juneteenth means. It's not just another day to just to be lax, but to maintain the sanctity of the day is really important. The industry obviously has so many different vehicles and platforms to be able to get that message out to a larger audience, so I think that's what the opportunity is on Friday.

Taylor K. Shaw: For the entertainment industry, having Juneteenth be less of a day of reflection and another day of action is what we should be encouraging across the board. I'm the founder and CEO of BWA studios, which was created to further build equity, specifically in the animation industry, but really serve as a blueprint for what is possible when we center the voices, stories and works of creatives of color. The industry also needs to take really big steps toward making solid, not momentary, but long-lasting commitment toward equity and that really has to be a key focus on Friday for the industry —"Okay, like what real, tangible and actual change are we going to start to implement within our companies and how is that going to be spread throughout the industry?"

How do we make sure this day doesn't go the way of #BlackoutTuesday, when there was a lot of criticism over silence and performative activism?

Baker: Inspire Justice has been doing a lot of work to organize celebrities to be a part of this. I think what happened with #BlackoutTuesday was that something that was started specifically for one industry morphed into something larger and there just wasn't a cohesive narrative that was being shared, so it was updating as the day went on and as things were becoming clear that certain hashtags were being consumed. What we've been trying to avoid, one, is by holding webinars and educating those with large platforms on what the history of Juneteenth actually is; we did one of those webinars on Wednesday and had a really great audience of influencers and industry leaders in the space to be a part of that conversation. Then we follow up each of these webinars with calls-to-action assets and talking points to supporting people and understanding, "What are vetted ways that you can engage with us on social media? What are Black activists asking of us all in this moment?" 

#BlackoutTuesday, because it was something that came up so organically, there wasn't that time to put in that preparation, but Juneteenth is something that has been celebrated since 1866 so Black communities specifically have been knowing that Juneteenth was coming up. We as a company have been able to pull together resources and assets and essentially a toolkit for how to engage with Juneteenth in that way. There are others doing great work as well, especially the #HellaJuneteenth team that is getting folks in the industry to commit to making it a paid holiday. They're also going further by providing them resources on what out-of-office emails could look like and what templates you can use to engage for the first time on the topic.

What's your message for how stars and influencers should be using their platform for Juneteenth?

Baker: The main thing that we've been encouraging folks is to really center Black voices; I think the times when things go most awry or when it's like, "Oh, I just got called out, my intentions are pure," are often when people are trying to speak for others. You can't go wrong by uplifting Black activists and community leaders who already have the trust of the community and also have that context, they can really contextualize what Juneteenth means in 2020. We've really been encouraging people to uplift from existing leadership like Movement for Black Lives and the Black Lives Matter Global Network. Also you can't go wrong by modeling for people what you don't know. I think sometimes, especially with influencers who are expected to be experts on a lot of different things, there's this urge to allow for that illusion and to try and maintain the illusion of being an expert. There's so much power in saying, "This is my first time hearing about this holiday, I'm taking the cues of Black activists who are asking us to do X, Y, and Z."

Something that we shared on Wednesday's Inspire Justice webinar was encouraging people to actually uplift the resources that they were going to dive into. So you're going to spend the day binge-listening to a podcast or watching the 13th documentary or reading a book by a Black author, share that with your followers and let them know: "For the day, this is the action that I'm taking to self educate and I encourage you to do the same." There's so many resources out there as to where we can start with that, I believe this was the first time that the New York Times bestsellers list was exclusively made up of books by Black authors. There's so much out there that we don't need to do too much digging about and there's a lot of great information that already exists so we don't really need to reinvent the wheel. That's what we've really been encouraging: when in doubt, repost and credit live leaders and black activists.

What's the importance of Juneteenth finally being widely recognized, both in Hollywood and beyond?

Baker: The biggest opportunity is raising awareness for the true history of the day. I think what's important to note is that the Emancipation Proclamation was signed in 1863 but all Black Americans weren't notified of their freedom until 1865. It's important to remember that because we have a history in this country of taking shortcuts at the expense of Black communities and that justice delayed is something that Black communities have traditionally been experiencing. When, especially those who are involved in entertainment and media and shaping the narrative that people knowingly or unknowingly take into their day-to-day lives and day-to-day actions, it's important that we continue to be honest about the history of this country. The narrative of "this isn't who we are" or "I'm just learning about these things" is coming from a place of being uninformed about the reality of how long and far this country has gone to ensure that Black lives were tertiary to the needs of the economy, to the needs of white society, etc. So just being really intentional about not letting this day be whitewashed or being diluted is really important, and then taking that time to also talk about "What does it mean for us to be celebrating a day about freedom in a time where most people do not feel free? What is the responsibility of the industry to be a part of creating action shifts?" to Taylor's point.

Shaw: We are in the business of story, so Hollywood, it's time to shift the narrative and get the stories right. Just as we encourage people to share the voices of color Friday on social media, Hollywood, it has to be even more than that — yes, do that, but it's important to share the true narratives of black people and really start to do that now with Juneteenth. This story, people don't know it and the true history of Black folks and displaced people being emancipated, we didn't even get that information. So it's going to be important for Hollywood to to share the mic as we say, and to really be committed to doing that in a meaningful and not just momentary way.

What would you like to see Juneteenth become going forward?

Shaw: A national holiday and day of action.

Baker: Heightened political power. Something that I shared in Wednesday's webinar was that the first time that Juneteenth was celebrated, it was formerly enslaved Black people coming together, pooling resources and buying land. The idea was that we had achieved some wins but we still had work to do. To Taylor's point around day of action, I just feel like specifically action around building political power and ensuring that black people actually have not just a seat at the table but a stake. 

What's your outlook at this moment and going forward?

Baker: I'm definitely optimistic about things. There's a beautiful Angela Davis quote that basically says, "To be an activist is to be an optimist because you have to believe that you can actually transform the world to engage in this kind of work." So I'm definitely optimistic and I'm also excited to see that many people are also interested in having the conversation of "Wait, we've been here before, why are we repeating the same conversations?" and looking to disrupt that cycle.

Shaw: For me as a black woman, of course I was aware and deeply connected to all of these issues, but the collective awakening that we're seeing, it feels like a paradigm shift. So I am energized and excited, with Inspire Justice, to play a key role in how Hollywood really takes this moment and is on the right side of history in this paradigm shift.

Emmys: TV Academy Ties Number of Nominees to Number of Submissions, Paving Way for 8 Drama and Comedy Noms

Emmys: TV Academy Ties Number of Nominees to Number of Submissions, Paving Way for 8 Drama and Comedy Noms

If you thought the Emmy Awards — which, between the Primetime telecast and two Creative Arts Awards ceremonies — didn't already nominate enough shows and talent, get ready for even more.

In recognition of the fact that Emmy submissions are up 15% over last season, the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences has decided to tie the number of nominees to the number of submissions per category.

And, using the new math, we can now expect eight, rather than seven, nominees for the two most prominent categories, best drama series and best comedy series.

"The increase in submissions is a reflection of the number of new voices, new television platforms and a tremendous growth in content from existing platforms across our industry," TV Academy chairman and CEO Frank Scherma said in a statement. "Despite production suspension resulting from COVID-19, there is a wealth of excellent work submitted for this year's competition."

The number of nominations in a category will now be determined using the following criteria:

1-19 submissions: A sliding scale between zero to 4 nominations
20-80 submissions: 5 nominations
81-160 submissions: 6 nominations
161-240 submissions: 7 nominations
240 submissions: 8 nominations

Paired performer categories (i.e. supporting actor comedy and supporting actress comedy) will have parity in the number of nominations.

This new rule also eliminates the previous 2% rule, which specified that in categories with five nominees, if the fifth and sixth top vote-getters were within 2% of each other, both would be nominated.

Mel Gibson Denies Renewed Allegations of Anti-Semitism Against Winona Ryder

Mel Gibson Denies Renewed Allegations of Anti-Semitism Against Winona Ryder

The actress says the actor asked her years ago at a party if she was an “oven dodger,” an apparent reference to her Jewish heritage.

Mel Gibson says renewed allegations of anti-semitic comments leveled against him by Winona Ryder are as false now as they were 10 years ago. 

The actress in a recent interview with the Sunday Times claimed Gibson, 25 years ago, asked if she was an “oven dodger,” an apparent reference to her Jewish heritage.

“We were at a crowded party with one of my good friends and Mel Gibson was smoking a cigar, and we’re all talking and he said to my friend, who’s gay, ‘Oh, wait, am I gonna get AIDS?’" she said in the interview. "And then something came up about Jews, and he said, ‘You’re not an oven dodger, are you?’” the actress said, adding Gibson later “tried” to apologize to her. She made a similar accusation in a 2010 interview with GQ

Gibson's rep, Alan Nierob, told The Hollywood Reporter Ryder's story is "100 percent untrue."

"She lied about it over a decade ago, when she talked to the press, and she’s lying about it now," Nierob said. "Also, she lied about him trying to apologize to her back then. He did reach out to her, many years ago, to confront her about her lies and she refused to address it with him." 

The denial may be met with skepticism as the actor-director had a huge fall from grace in 2006 after he made a number of anti-semitic remarks while being arrested for drunk driving, saying in part "Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world." He went on an apology tour, but was still blacklisted in Hollywood for years before slowly re-emerging with a few acting roles and his directorial comeback, 2016's Hacksaw Ridge, which won two Academy Awards. Gibson was nominated for best director that year. 

Court Stalls on Halting Release of John Bolton Book

Court Stalls on Halting Release of John Bolton Book

With shades of historic First Amendment court battles from decades past and high stakes given the country is in the midst of a presidential election year, a D.C. federal judge on Friday refused to halt the imminent release of John Bolton's The Room Where It Happened. Instead, he's taking the matter under submission and will make his final decision after an in-camera review of confidential information with DOJ lawyers. 

The Trump administration filed its lawsuit against Bolton on Tuesday and moved for a temporary restraining order Thursday despite the fact that the book has already been sent to retailers around the nation, despite how many newspapers have already spilled the juiciest contents of the book in their own published stories, and despite Bolton pretaping an interview with ABC News that is set to run this weekend. The government's complaint alleges that the book's publication breaches Bolton's confidentiality obligations as former national security adviser and that he is flouting a contract that requires him to submit material to the government for prepublication review.

That the government has the right to enforce secrecy agreements with officers who see classified information is confirmed by the Supreme Court's 1980 decision in Snepp v. United States, but here, the question isn't merely whether the government is likely to prove Bolton has breached security. (He argues that he spent months seeking prepublication clearance, that he was led to believe that the current iteration of his book contained no classified secrets, and that government's attempt to block is pretextual.) A federal court also had to wrestle with an injunction that would act as a "prior restraint" on free speech. That evoked comparisons to the famous Pentagon Papers case from 1971.

The First Amendment implications in Trump's attempt to block Bolton swiftly attracted interested third parties including the American Civil Liberties Union, the Association of American Publishers, PEN America and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. In amicus briefs submitted shortly before today's hearing, these groups sounded the alarm about the proposed restraint, which went as far as a demand that booksellers around the nation should also be subject.

U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth, who had quickly consented to a virtual hearing to entertain the motion for a restraining order, also had to wrestle with the question of whether the government could really show imminent harm given how the book's eyewitness account of Trump's fumbling and arguably corrupt dealings with foreign leaders had already reached the public sphere.

Lamberth began the hearing by acknowledging that. "The horse, as we used to say in Texas, seems to be out of the barn," he said, before asking the DOJ what he can really do in this situation. David Morrell responded that the injunction isn't an "all or nothing" request and there's "massive government interest" in limiting further distribution and making sure the prepublication requirement isn't "willy-nilly breached by disgruntled authors." He suggested Simon & Schuster could claw back the books from distributors and give them to the government and it could still be possible to prevent the distribution of electronic and audio copies.

One central issue is when some of the information the DOJ believes is classified was deemed as such and whether that happened after Ellen Knight, a senior director at the National Security Council, completed her review of Bolton's book and found no classified information. Morrell said one example was classified after NCS's Michael Ellis completed a second review (one Bolton says he wasn't made aware of) and two other examples would require additional research. 

Lamberth also asked whether Trump instructed officials to designate portions of the book as classified. Morrell said he hasn't talked to the president and doesn't know. He also defended that it was "entirely appropriate" for a second NSC official to conduct a review given that Bolton was national security adviser and is "providing details about ongoing policy matters during the same administration in which he served" and said "there are certain passages in his book that will damage the national security of the United States."

Later, Bolton's lawyer Charles Cooper argued Lamberth is "utterly powerless" to do anything and this isn't really a judicial proceeding. "It's theater," he said. "It's to use your courtroom as a stage and enlist you as a player." 

Cooper argued Bolton fulfilled his contractual obligation and only would have needed further written permission if Knight had found there to still be classified information in the final manuscript after making the author remove confidential, secret and top-secret information over four months of review. He noted that an amended complaint filed Friday morning takes the teeth out of his motion to dismiss, and he'll refile as a summary judgment motion if he has to. Now there's talk of sensitive compartmented information, or SCI, which was covered under a separate confidentiality contract and would require a written release before Bolton could publish. 

Bolton's lawyer argued that Knight never mentioned a concern about SCI and the government never even hinted that there might be until these filings. He suggests the information may have been "retroactively classified." Cooper also noted that Ellis had only recently received classification authority and it was "unlikely in the extreme" that he'd ever completed a prepublication review before this one — and argued that there's training required to enable that authority that Ellis didn't complete until the day after he finished his evaluation of Bolton's book.

After a two-hour hearing, Lamberth opted to take the matter under submission. The DOJ has more evidence to share about the classified information allegedly contained in the book and the court will conduct an in-camera review. Cooper won't be allowed in the room because he doesn't have the security clearance. 

Bookshelf

Civil Rights Attorney Benjamin Crump Signs With UTA

Civil Rights Attorney Benjamin Crump Signs With UTA

Crump represents the families of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor.

Benjamin Crump, a civil rights attorney who represents the families of victims of police violence, has signed with UTA.

Crump is currently representing the families of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Ahmaud Arbery and has also represented the families of Trayvon Martin, Tamir Rice and Michael Brown, among others.

A recent New Yorker story noted that Crump is "often referred to as 'the black Gloria Allred.'"

The Florida-based attorney — founder and principal of Ben Crump Law — is the current president of the National Civil Rights Trial Lawyers Association and served as the 73rd president of the National Bar Association. His accolades include the NAACP Thurgood Marshall Award and the SCLC Martin Luther King Servant Leader Award, among others.

In 2018, Crump launched his production company, Brooklyn Media. He exec produced the doc Woman in Motion, which follows Star Trek actress Nichelle Nichols and her role in recruiting men and women for NASA's space shuttle program. His other industry credits include hosting legal docudramas Evidence of Innocence and A&E's Who Killed Tupac: The Search for Justice. He appeared in 2017 Thurgood Marshall biopic Marshall and BET special I Am Trayvon.

UTA plans to work closely with him across TV, podcasting, film and speaking opportunities. Crump continues to be managed by Curated By Media.

From 'Little Fires Everywhere' to 'Normal People': How Novelists Act as "Tuning Forks" to TV Scribes

From Little Fires Everywhere to Normal People: How Novelists Act as Tuning Forks to TV Scribes

The authors of the best-selling books 'Defending Jacob' and 'I Know This Much Is True' also reveal what it's like to see their stories adapted into limited series: "It's like speaking in a different language."

When Celeste Ng learned her novel Little Fires Everywhere would be adapted into a limited series for Hulu, she made a decision to let go. Instead of holding on to the story that lived in the pages she'd written, she recognized that translating the novel for television would require her to put her trust in other people.

"It felt really important to me that the people who knew what they were doing be allowed to do it, and that the project be given enough space to become its own thing," she says.

Ng, 39, along with three other authors of novels turned into limited series — Sally Rooney, 29 (Normal People); William Landay, 56 (Defending Jacob); and Wally Lamb, 69 (I Know This Much Is True) — spoke with THR about how choosing not to worry and relinquishing control allowed their stories to thrive as limited series.

"I wanted the filmmakers to feel free to create, using these characters and expanding the story that I created into something new and different that leverages the strengths of film to tell the story in a way that I have leveraged the strengths of literature," Landay says. "I never felt protective or threatened … by the adaptation at all."

Such was the case for all four authors, whose biggest concerns centered on making sure the shows' creators had all they needed to invent their own versions of their stories rather than line-by-line replicas of the books. Most of the novels could have been adapted into something much shorter than an hours-long limited series. Depending on the length of each episode and the number of episodes, these limited series range from six to 10 hours — much more expansive than a two-hour film adaptation.

In the case of Defending Jacob, which hinges on author Landay's understanding of the country's complex legal system and the culture in suburban Massachusetts, this meant extensive conversations about how the events laid out in the novel could be realistically expanded.

"Unlike [adapting into a] film, which is about cutting material to make it fit the time constraints of the movie, [we were] expanding what was in the book to fill eight hours of screen time," Landay says. "Mark [Bomback, the show's writer] and I would speak about problems and creative decisions along the way. Mark is a wonderful, sensitive writer and very experienced at his craft, [but] he'd never been to Boston and had no experience with criminal law or local culture. So, there were things that we necessarily had to talk about."

Lamb's behemoth I Know This Much Is True benefited from the limited series treatment because its length made it difficult to condense into a film. Twentieth Century Fox originally purchased the rights after the book's publication in 1998. But as the studio struggled to adapt the 900-page novel into a two-hour film without losing integral parts of the narrative, the project sat in development limbo for more than a decade.

In 2014, Lamb reacquired the rights to the novel and, when HBO and Mark Ruffalo came knocking, the author knew the story needed to be told in a longer format. "Mark and I put our heads together," Lamb says. "He was in agreement that this was going to work better as a series, so that was the way we entered the whole thing."

Lamb is no stranger to the art of screenwriting. It's a skill he admires after attempting to adapt his first novel, She's Come Undone, which is why he gladly turned over the responsibility to writer-director Derek Cianfrance.

"I tend to overwrite," Lamb says. "[Screenwriting] is a good discipline for me to learn, because it would teach me how to be more concise, but it's not something I think I would be very good at."

Rooney, on the other hand, kept Normal People quite short, opting to skip most of the fluff and jump to the pivotal moments between its main characters, Marianne and Connell. The result is a novel that reads episodically, making a limited series the perfect format to bring her story to life.

"The book often just leaps forward a couple of months, or a couple of weeks, because I wanted to skip parts of the narrative and go straight to the turning points," Rooney says. "So, because the book was constructed that way, it's difficult to confine that to a film without using the episodic moments in these characters' lives. It felt like the most natural way to preserve the division of time in the book was to do it through episodes of TV. It felt like a much more natural form of storytelling."

Filmmaking is a far cry from the solitary act of writing a novel, where all the decisions come down to the author's discretion.

"You have to trust that the actors and the director and everybody involved will help to build up that picture," Rooney says.

Each novelist had a different level of involvement with his or her book's adaptation. Neither Ng nor Landay adapted their work, but they did provide feedback when the scripts were in development. "I was sort of like a tuning fork to them," Ng explains. "They had an idea of what they wanted, and then they checked with me to see if their idea was hitting the right notes."

Lamb, on the other hand, opted not to read any scripts for the HBO series. "I said, 'I don't want you to ever feel that you have to be tied down to making this an exact replica of my book, because I know that books and film scripts are apples and oranges,' " he recalls.

The stories changed quite a bit on their journeys to becoming limited series, as the screenwriters added elements in order to fill several hours of screen time and tried to externalize characters' inner monologues. Instead of worrying, the novelists say they chose to recognize that changes — sometimes drastic ones — are sometimes necessary to make their stories engaging onscreen.

"It's not just [taking] the novel and [putting] it onscreen. It's like speaking in a different language. There have to be some changes," Ng says. "I tend to be a very interior writer. I have a lot of characters stopping and remembering things or realizing things quietly, and you can't do that onscreen. You have to dramatize everything through action."

It helps, of course, to have high-caliber talent backing the project. Lamb recalls his agent sending his book to Ruffalo on a whim and receiving a glowing response from the actor.

"I cannot tell you how much I love this book. It is so deeply moving and so personal to me in some ways," Ruffalo's letter to Lamb's agent reads. "I know these people. I grew up with them. … Please let Mr. Lamb know that I am doing my best and that I already know that I want to do this. It means so much to me that someone with his talent would think of me for this. The time is right for this to happen."

After nearly two decades of hearing people tell Lamb his book was worthy of a film adaptation, Ruffalo's words struck a new chord.

"You can always tell when somebody is bullshitting you if they use the word 'passionate,' " Lamb says. "They say, 'We are passionate to do this.' Mark was the only one who didn't use the word 'passionate,' but he sounded as if he was."

The same was true for all the novelists, who were lucky enough to hand their works over to producers like Reese Witherspoon, who co-stars in Little Fires Everywhere, or directors like Lenny Abrahamson, who helmed half of Normal People. Knowing the projects were in good hands made the process exciting for the novelists rather than nerve-wracking.

"[They] would often invite me when scenes were being shot that came directly from the book, so I could hear actors delivering the words that I had written," says Landay, whose Defending Jacob was adapted for Apple TV+ and stars Chris Evans. "It's a surreal experience. It's so odd to sit on the set and see people working on this story that you just created out of whole cloth."


And when they finally had the chance to watch the shows, the novelists knew they'd made the right decision in handing off their stories. In fact, not only did stepping back from the confines of the book allow the authors to be more open-minded about the adaptation process, but it also gave them the opportunity to view their own stories through a new lens — the way that readers saw them.

"I sometimes forget that this [series] is based on [my book]," Ng says. "When we were watching screeners, I turned to my husband and I said, 'I wonder what's going to happen next!' and he looked at me like, 'You know what's going to happen. This is your story.' "

This story first appeared in a June stand-alone issue of The Hollywood Reporter magazine. To receive the magazine, click here to subscribe.

IAB Sets Virtual NewFronts Schedule

IAB Sets Virtual NewFronts Schedule

The event runs June 22-26.

The IAB has set the final schedule for its first-ever virtual NewFronts event. 

The annual pitchfest, in which digital brands present their businesses to advertisers, will run for five days in late June, giving companies like Hulu, Snap, YouTube, Facebook and TikTok the opportunity to host digital-first showcases — albeit significantly shorter ones —amid the global coronavirus pandemic. 

The NewFronts typically takes place in New York in early May ahead of the television upfronts, but the event was delayed this year in order to accommodate the shift to virtual presentations. 

IAB says it already has 8,500 media buyers and members of the advertising industry scheduled to attend the event, which will include more than 30 presentations from June 22-26. 

Here is the full lineup: 

Monday, June 22

12:15 p.m. — Roku
12:45 p.m. — IAB NewFronts Welcome
12:55 p.m. — IAB There
1:15 p.m. — Crackle Plus
1:50 p.m. — Tubi
2:30 p.m. — Samsung Ads
3 p.m. — Hulu

Tuesday, June 23

12:15 p.m. — Snap
1 p.m. — Condé Nast
1:30 p.m. — Team Whistle
1:40 p.m. — IAB Research
2 p.m. — Facebook
2:10 p.m. — Ellen Digital
3 p.m. — Vevo
3:20 p.m. — Barstool Sports

Wednesday, June 24

12:15 p.m. — The Wall Street Journal / Barron's Group
12:55 p.m. — Vice Media Group
1:20 p.m. — Quantcast
1:30 p.m. — Forbes: Disruption Redefined
2:05 p.m. — CMO Interview
2:25 p.m. — State of New Panel
2:40 p.m. — NPR
3 p.m. — Vibenomics
3:10 p.m.  — American Public Media
3:30 p.m. — IAB There
3:25 p.m. — NewFronts Live

Thursday, June 25

12:10 p.m. — YouTube
12:50 p.m. — TiVo
1:10 p.m. — Tremor Video
1:45 p.m. — Xandr
2:05 p.m. — GSTV
2:15 p.m. — Digitas
2:40 p.m. - TikTok 

Friday, June 26

12:15 p.m. — 3BlackDot
12:35 p.m. — In-Game Success
12:45 p.m. — IAB There
1 p.m. — Tru Optik
1:20 p.m. — Top to Top
2 p.m. — Ad Age NewFronts Wrap Party

*All times ET

At Tulsa Rally, Trump Says "Kung Flu" is Among Names for COVID-19

At Tulsa Rally, Trump Says Kung Flu is Among Names for COVID-19

The President further claimed that his administration is not recognized for the work they have done toward slowing the coronavirus pandemic. "All we do is get hit on like we're terrible," he said.

At Donald Trump's campaign rally at the BOK Center in Tulsa, Oklahoma on Saturday, he said that "Kung Flu" is one of the names for COVID-19, the diseased caused by the novel coronavirus.

The President, who has previously referred to the illness as a "Chinese virus" — claiming his language isn't racist if the virus comes from Wuhan, China — made the reference early on in his address. Of the pandemic, Trump noted that his administration has "saved hundreds and thousands of lives" by closing American businesses early to curb the spread of the virus. 

"By the way, it's a disease, without question, [that] has more names than any disease in history. I can name Kung Flu. I can name 19 different versions of names," he said to the crowd at the podium. 

Trump further claimed that his administration is not recognized for the work they have done toward slowing the pandemic. "All we do is get hit on like we're terrible," he said. "What we've done with ventilators, medical equipment, testing ... we've tested 25 million people ... probably 20 million more than anybody else."

View the live rally below.

Behind WME's Ouster of George Freeman

Behind WMEs Ouster of George Freeman

The agent sent a reply-all email on a chain about the Black Lives Matter movement that disparaged colleagues.

George Freeman’s abrupt ouster from WME created a mystery: What was in the “reply-all” email he had inadvertently sent to colleagues that led to his June 18 dismissal after 20 years with the firm?

The incident began when the agency sought feedback from partners on how to respond positively to the Black Lives Matter movement that has many industry leaders making statements to express their commitment to redressing the country’s and Hollywood’s long history of racial injustice and imbalance.

WME has only a handful of Black agents (the agency declined to provide a number) out of about 250 to 300 total but is hardly alone among entertainment companies (or publications that cover the industry) in terms of having failed to reach any meaningful diversity.

Four agents were quick to respond with enthusiasm, according to sources. That prompted Freeman, whose star client for many years has been Russell Crowe, to type a response disparaging them for hypocrisy and virtue-signaling, thinking he was sending his comments to only one associate. (The Hollywood Reporter won't name the agents targeted in Freeman's email due to privacy concerns.)

Freeman called one colleague who has been recognized for efforts to promote diversity a “phony,” according to sources. And in an excerpt obtained by THR, he wrote of a female agent: “Tell me which diverse assistants she’s ever hired helped or promoted? Which piece of diverse talent has she ever championed?” He cited one exception, whom he said this agent “only hooked up to when he became a cause celeb” due to events in the news, but said otherwise “she has never worked to fully back a black, brown, Asian ... [or] LGBTQ artist.”

One veteran producer familiar with the matter say he doubted Freeman would have been fired if WME and its parent, Endeavor, weren't facing financial challenges. But a longtime WME partner says once the email was widely distributed, allowing Freeman to remain became impossible because it would constitute an implied endorsement of the criticisms of the four agents.

Tatiana Siegel contributed reporting. 

Recent Posts